William Jameson b. 27 Mar 1730 Kirrilamont, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland d. bef.1785: Jam?sons of Bute

1730 - 1785 (54 years)

Personal Information | Notes | Sources | All | PDF

Name	William Jameson
Parents Identified as Neill Jameson, on his 1730 O.P.R. Birth Record [1]
Birth	27 Mar 1730	Kirrilamont, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland [1]
	William Jameson OPR Birth Record The 1730 OPR Birth Record for William Jameson
Christening	29 Mar 1730	Kirrilamont, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland [1]
Gender	Male
Death	bef.1785
Person ID	I143	Main
Links To	This person is also William Jamieson in the tree "Alex-Bute" at Famous Jam?sons
Last Modified	22 Aug 2020

	Test Type	Taken by	Haplogroup	Test Information
DNA Tests	1 DNA test is associated with William Jameson
	Y-DNA-37	Christopher Neil Jamieson	R-M269	Most distant ancestor: William Jameson, b. 27 Mar 1730, Kirrilamont, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland d. bef.1785

Father	Neil McKeimy/Jameson, b. c.1710, Rothesay, Bute, Scotland
Mother	Margaret Stewart, b. 27 Dec 1711, Rothesay, Bute, Scotland
Marriage	16 Feb 1727	Rothesay, Bute, Scotland [2]
	Neil and Margaret (Stewart) McKeimy 1827 Marriage Record The 1727 O.P.R. Marriage Record for Neil and Margaret (Stewart) Jameson
Family ID	F273	Group Sheet \| Family Chart

Family Margaret Frazer, b. 2 Sep 1733, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland

Children

+	1. John Jamieson, b. 6 Feb 1761, Shore of Mount Stewart, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland d. 18 Dec 1823, Rothesay, Bute, Scotland (Age 62 years)
	2. Elizabeth Jamieson, b. 5 Feb 1763, Shore of Mount Stewart, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland
+	3. William Jamieson, b. 11 Aug 1764, Shore of Mt Stewart, Kingarth, Bute, Scotland d. aft.1807 (Age 42 years)

Family ID F40 Group Sheet | Family Chart

Last Modified 22 Aug 2020

Notes

There are descendants of this William and Margaret (Frazer) Jameson who are not completely comfortable William Jameson is actually a descendant of Neil and Margaret (Stewart) McKeimy/Jameson, given that no actual link or other references, apart from William's O.P.R. Birth record identifying his father as "Neil of of Kirrilamont." We have it connected as such, considering it is possibly reasonable and logical and because there seems to be no other acknowledgeable alternative. [1]